segunda-feira, 29 de setembro de 2008

Polunsky Unit Texas (dia a dia)

"Waiting to die"

POLUNSKY UNIT -TEXAS



General Information Guide

Informations for friends of Texas' death row
give me an e-mail for your question.
P.H.@deathrow-texas.com

What about the treatment of prisoners in Texas prisons?

June 2004

Petition -please read and sign:


http://www.PetitionOnline.com/safety04/petition.html


To: Mr. Carl RAYNOLDS - TDCJ General Counsel & the TDCJ General Direction
To whom it may concern,

Recently, global attention has been focused for weeks on the abuse of
Iraqi inmates in Baghdad's prisons.

What about the treatment of prisoners in US prisons? and especially
here in Texas ?

Most of us, who have a loved one inside know that similar treatment might
happen for any kind of reason. It might and it does occur, and it is
easy to further humiliate a human being who has already been condemned and
sentenced to death.

Is this the picture we wish to present to the world?

What is wrong for the Iraqi prisoners IS for similarly wrong for our
inmates!

How can we pretend to show the non-democratic world the right path to
Democracy and the respect all humans inherently deserve if we are not able
to start with our own prisoners, regardless of whatever they did in the
past which placed them in our penitentiaries ?

In Texas, there are about 150, 000 people incarcerated. Who cares about
them?

Thousands of complaints are filed by inmates each year and while some are
fabrications, most are not. Those recently received from inmates who
are incarcerated in general population and D.R highlight ongoing problems.

Strong measures have to be taken against all those who are ordering or
tolerating the abuses in America's prisons. America is a signatory to
the UN document "The Minimum Standard of Treatment and Punishment." In
Exxence, this document recognized that all prisoners, even those under a
sentence of death, have inherent human rights which cannot be taken from
them.

On June 6th, 2004 many in the USA celebrated the civilized world's
freedom which was recovered after thousands of human lives were
sacrificed during World War II. The President, who was the ex-Governor
of Texas, spoke about compassion and forgiveness.

But there must be more than words to make this a reality. There is a time
for ACTION. Human rights begin at home, and the time has come to
recognize that ALL people, including those incarcerated and even
(especially) those under a death sentence, enjoy the most basic human
right of all: the right to life!

This is why we have decided to show the world what is taking place here
and have thus created this online petition to attract people's attention
on what COMPASSION is in within our prison's walls.

The petititoners,


Sincerely,

The Daily Schedule
Der Tagesablauf

Time

Activity

3:00 a.m.

Breakfast is served
Das Frühstück wird gebracht

5:00 a.m.

Breakfast trays and outgoing mail are picked up.
Frühstückstabletts und Ausgangspost werden abgeholt.

6:00 a.m.

Shift change. Guards turn on all lights and wake everybody up, asking for names and numbers.
Schichtwechsel.Wärter drehen das gesamte Licht an und wecken jeden und fragen nach Namen und Nummern.

7:00 a.m.

Recreation for one hour, starting anywhere from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m.


Erholung für 1 Stunde, startet irgendwann zwischen 7:00 und 9:00 Uhr morgens.

10:00 a.m.

Lunch
Mittagessen

11:00 a.m.

Lunch trays are picked up.
Essentabletts werden eingesammelt.

12 Noon
12:00 Uhr

Showers. You might be in there for 20 minutes to an hour.
Duschen. So um die 20 Minuten bis 1 Stunde.

1:30 p.m



13:30 Uhr

Guards come around, turn on all the lights and check names and numbers to make sure no one has checked out on their shift.

Wärter gehen herum, drehen das gesamte Licht an und kontrollieren Namen und Nummern, um sicher zu gehen, dass niemand ausserhalb seiner Zelle ist.

2:00 p.m.
14:00 Uhr

Shift change. Guards come around and check names and numbers.
Schichtwechsel. Wärter gehen herum und kontrollieren Namen und Nummern.

4:00 p.m.
16:00 Uhr

Dinner is served.
Abendessen wird gebracht.

5:30 p.m.
17:30 Uhr

Dinner trays are picked up.
Essentabletts werden abgeholt.

7:00 p.m.


19:00 Uhr

Guards make rounds with porters, sweeping and mopping the run ways

Wachen machen Rundgänge mit Pförtnern, fegen und wischen die Laufgänge.

7:30 p.m.

20:30 Uhr

Guards pass out the daily inbound mail.

Wachen verteilen die tägliche Eingangspost.

9:30 p.m.



21:30 Uhr

Guards come around, turn on all the lights and check names and numbers to make sure no one has checked out on their shift.

Wachen kommen herum, drehen das gesamte Licht an und kontrollieren Namen und Nummern um sicher zu stellen, dass niemand ausserhalb seiner Zelle ist.

10:00 p.m.


22:00 Uhr

Shift change. Guards turn on all lights and wake everybody up, asking for names and numbers.

Schichtwechsel. Wachen drehen das gesamte Licht an und wecken jeden, fragen nach Namen und Nummern.

11:30 p.m.

23:30 Uhr

Guards make rounds with porters, sweeping run ways and checking to see if you need any I-60s sick cell request, visiting change list, etc.

Wachen machen Runden mit Pförtnern, fegen Laufwege und fragen nach, ob jemand etwas braucht, Wechsel auf der Besucherliste usw.

Midnight

24:00 Uhr

Between midnight and 1:30 a.m. guards come around and change laundry.

Zwischen Mitternacht und 2:00 morgens kommen die Wachen herum und tauschen Unterwäsche, Shorts und Socken aus.

3:00 a.m.

3:00 Uhr

Breakfast is served. A new day begins

Frühstück wird gebracht. Ein neuer Tag beginnt.





Visit Times

Monday 8 a.m - 5 p.m
Tuesday 8 a.m - 5 p.m
Wednesday 8 a.m - 12 noon
Thursday 8 a.m - 5 p.m
Friday 8 a.m - 5 p.m
Saturday see info for your confirmation 5.30 p.m - 7.30 p.m and 8.pm - 10.pm
Sunday no visits
Visting time 2 hours - Special visits (from about 500miles away) 4 hours the day (2 days a month)

Huntsville Unit (história e fotos)

Ellis One Emblem

Welcome to HUNTSVILLE!?

Texas and the Death Penalty

##############################

Map of TexasThe City of Huntsville is part of Walker County in east Texas approximately 70 miles north of Houston, and 170 miles south of Dallas/Fort Worth via Interstate 45. Huntsville was founded in 1835, and the population today is about 36.000. A big university, more than 70 churches - and 7 prisons belong to Huntsville. The most famous "son" of the city in the last century was Sam Houston, the founder of the state Texas. In rememberence of him the university is named after him - and there is this white alabaster-statue of Sam Houston near the Interstate, as tall as a church-tower and with a weight of 60 tons.

For more than 150 years Huntsville is the "prison-city" of Texas. When Austin had been chosen to be the capital of Texas, as a compensation Huntsville was made to the center of the texan execution of the sentence. Today every third or fourth citizen of Huntsville is a prison-inmate - the information varies between 9.000 and 15.000 inmates who are in the prisons of Huntsville. Therefore the TDCJ (Texas Department of Criminal Justice) is the biggest employer, and only 2 % of the citizens of Huntsville are out of work.

##############################

Old SparkyIn Huntsville or its vicinity there is also the Death Row of Texas. Almost 400 prisoners are awaiting their execution - sometimes waiting more than 20 years. 36 of the 50 states of the USA have the Death Penalty in their law, but in executions Texas is clearly number one of all the states. Since the reintroduction of the Death Penalty in the USA, Texas did execute 407 human beings in the time from 1982 until July 2008 - 37 in the year 1997, 35 in 1999, and 40 (new record) in 2000.

Some dates about the history of the Death Penalty in Huntsville/Texas: Hanging was means of execution between 1819 and 1923, then Texas authorized the use of the electric chair. The chair - called "Old Sparky" - was built by inmates, and 361 human beings lost their life between 1924 and 1964, being executed with this electric chair. Today the chair can be seen in the Prison Museum of Huntsville. When capital punishment was declared "cruel and unusual punishment" by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1972, there were 45 men on Death Row in Texas and 7 in county jails with a death sentence. All of the sentences were commuted to life sentences by the Governor of Texas. After the reintroduction of the Death Penalty in the USA in 1976, Texas adopted a year later the lethal injection as means of execution - which was used first in 1982.

##############################

For the lethal injection the condemned man (or woman) is strapped unto a gurney, with needles for injection in both arms. First some water with common salt shall clean the veins. When the inmate has spoken his last words, the executioner starts the procedure and three different chemicals flow into the body: 1. a very high dose of the narcotic Sodium Thiopental, that makes the man fall into coma; 2. Pancuronium Bromide, a muscle-relaxant which causes the collapse of diaphragm and lungs; 3. Potassium Chloride to stop the heart beat. The whole process takes about 7 minutes and the cost of the drugs is $86 per execution.

Death Gurney

Witnesses of the execution are some officials of the media, and up to five relatives of the condemned inmate. They stand behind glass, but very close to the gurney. Since 1995 relatives of the victims are also allowed to witness the execution. Therefore the witness-room was divided with a wall into two parts. To avoid any trouble both different "parties" are strictly separated from each other.

##############################

The Walls Unit

The Walls Unit

The executions take place in the oldest prison of Huntsville which is called "Walls Unit" (today also: "Huntsville Unit"). The Walls Unit is in the very center of Huntsville. Until 1965 the inmates with a death sentence also lived there. But when the number of death sentences increased, Death Row became a part of "Ellis Unit One" which is about 12 miles away from the city of Huntsville.

Ellis Unit One

Ellis Unit One

After a failed attempt to escape of some inmates in fall of 1998, Death Row was moved to the "Terrell Unit" in Livingston, which meanwhile was renamed into "Polunsky Unit". In the Polunsky Unit the inmates live in total isolation. More about the conditions in Polunsky is to be read here: http://www.deathrow.at/welcometohell/.

Terrell Unit

Polunsky Unit (f.k.a. Terrell Unit)

##############################

The citizens of Huntsville appreciate the friendly atmosphere of their community - and in fact they are hospitable and ready to help. The many executions often are hardly noticed, because meanwhile they are common in Huntsville - as common as the special offer of the "Killer-Burger" at the fastfood-restaurant, which was located just across the street from the Walls Unit until it was closed:

Killerburger

More information about the City of Huntsville is to be found here: http://www.chamber.huntsville.tx.us or http://www.huntsvilletexas.com - and the latest news every day in "The Huntsville Item", the local newspaper, in the Internet under the address http://www.itemonline.com. Under "Local News" there is a report almost after each execution.

The prison-cemetary of Huntsville:

Prison-Cemetary

Only the inmate-number and the date of death is to be found on the white crosses - and an "X" when the inmate was executed. Meanwhile this practice was changed and the deceased or executed prisoners get a tombstone with their name:

Tombstones

**********

Alvin Kelly in Polunsky Unit

Alvin Kelly
Texas Death Row

Hymns by Alvin Kelly
Interview with Alvin Kelly - By The Kilgore News Herald

TRIAL BY FIRE

My name is Alvin Kelly, I am presently incarcerated on Texas Death Row
at the Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Texas. We (Death Row) were moved
over here to the then Terrell Unit since named Polunsky Unit in March
2000 from Ellis One Unit in Huntsville, Texas, where we had a work
program, religious services, in-cell craft program, group exercise and
in and outs each hour on the hour, just as population does. Of course
we were not allowed to mingle with population inmates, we were kept in a
Death Row society separated from all the others.

Since our move to the new Polunsky Unit we have been placed in isolation
cells and denied all we have grown used to. I have been on DR now for
over 10 years, 8 of those years I spent on the work program free of
handcuffs and allowed all privileges as were available at that time.

Since coming here to the Polunsky Unit we are locked in our cells 23
hours a day. We are allowed out for one hour exercise plus a shower.
The rest of the time we are in our cells. These are isolation cells 11
ft x 7 ft with a stainless steel sink and toilet, a bunk against the far
wall and a small table built into the wall by the head of the bunk, all
made of steel.

We are not allowed any work program at all, no TVs, no religious
services, no craft program, and no group rec. Everything here is single
man cells and single man rec (exercise). We are strip searched and
handcuffed every time we leave our cell for any reason. Escorted by 2
officers, one holding on to your arm at all times, to any place we go,
shower, rec, medical or visitation. Then placed in the cage at
destination and uncuffed, all except medical. You are never uncuffed
during medical exam at all for any reason.

I explain all of this to give you an idea of what a day on DR is like
and the isolation cells add to the tension and atmosphere. I am a
Christian and consider myself a strong and mature Christian. As I’ve
said, I’ve been on the Row now for over 10 years and I have never been
in any trouble and never had a disciplinary case of any kind for any
reason. At Ellis Unit I was allowed Bible study on Friday nights and
church service on Sunday. So I kept my life filled with doing God’s
business and reading and studying His word. My perspective on most
things is different than most because I align all I do to God’s law and
His word. I try to live at peace with all men, including the authority
over me here.

I learned a lot about myself after coming to the Polunsky Unit back in
March 2000. A lot of it I didn’t like and was honestly very ugly. My
speech changed, my attitude towards others changed, my temper got
shorter and my whole world just seemed to be out of control. I still
read by Bible daily, do a college Bible study course, and pray 3- times
a day. But still I seem to be mad most of the time.

In December of 2001 the Unit instituted a new policy of our personal
property could not exceed 2 bags. So this brought on a major shakedown
which we were all locked down in our cells 24/7. During this shakedown
I received my very first disciplinary case which was for having my old
craft supplies that I was once allowed to purchase while at Ellis One.
This consisted of my small stapler, staples, craft scissors, 1 oz glue
bottle, craft razor blade, and some clear tape. All of which I’ve had
for over 2 years of being here. I pleaded guilty to the charge because
I was in possession of the items. However, a 10 year clean disciplinary
record did not mean anything, so I was given 15 days cell restriction,
then placed on Level 2 and moved to F-pod. F-pod is a disciplinary pod
totally Level 2 and Level 3. Level 2 is property restriction, i.e. radio,
fan typewriter, all electrical, no commissary except 10 dollars postage
materials (stamps, pen, legal pads, envelopes etc.) every 2 weeks.
Level 2 can also buy hygiene supplies once every 30 days, i.e. shampoo,
toothpaste, deodorant. We are not allowed anything else from the unit
commissary. We’re only allowed rec one hour a day Monday – Thursday, 4
days a week. On Friday, Saturday and Sunday we are locked down 24/7.
We were not even allowed our thermal underwear this winter even when it
was down to 30 degrees outside. We are only allowed 2 regular visits a
month. Level 1 is allowed 1 visit per week each month.

Level 3 is not allowed any hygiene supplies at all, only postage every 2
weeks. So the atmosphere down here is filled with animosity. The
people back here are denied anything beyond the meager necessities to
survive in any sort of dignity or humanity. It is an evil and vile
place. The atmosphere is filled with cussing, beating and banging and
floods, fires, feces and urine being chunked on people, gas being
sprayed in peoples’ cells or the day room where everyone has to breathe
it in. Visitation being denied some just because they live on F-pod,
and it just goes on and on.

I write this article to reflect what I as a Christian have learned in my
stay back here at F-pod. I do not begrudge or belittle any man back
here his stand or actions against this unfair and unjust disciplinary
system. I myself have to answer to God first and then to man. I try to
live my life, even back here, in obedience to God’s law and submissive
to man’s. I’ve found it hard, cruel and at times almost unbearable.
However, what I have learned is that God sometimes allows us to be
placed in a situation or circumstances of our own making to allow us to
face a deep seated sin in our lives so we can recognize it and confess
it to Him, and grow in maturity and spirituality. Mine I came to know
face to face was my anger. I am not proud of my actions upon first
arriving on F-pod nor my response to the officials around me, as well as
other inmates. However, as I was faced with all this and came to see
the ugly anger buried deep within me, I began to cry out to God, Help
me!

The first day I did this I must have went to God 20 times asking for His
help to get past my anger. The next day maybe 15, then 10, then 5, and
so on until even now I still get angry and believe me in this place its
just a matter of time. But now as soon as I do, no matter what the
circumstances, I go straight to God and I’m over it. I may not still be
happy but I’m not out of control either, therefore I sin not. I take it
to God, he calms my soul, forgives me, I therefore forgive the person I
was angry with and God deals with the problem so its not a problem any
more.

I still have a long way to go in my walk and I am trying every day to
study and pray to come closer to Christ so I can be a witness in this
darkness to all those who are lost so they too can come to know the hope
and the joy of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ.

Alvin Kelly 99012
Polunsky Unit
Feb. 19 2002

Alvin Kelly would appreciate pen pals and mail.
Please forward your mail to him directly at the following address:

Mr. Alvin Kelly , #999012
Polunsky Unit DR.
3872 FM 350 South
Livingston Texas
77351 USA

Carta de Roger parte 2 :P

Welcome from Roger!

We have asked Roger to write a welcome letter for the visitors of this website, he sent us the following text:

« To all my friends who are soon to become my brothers and sisters.

I thank you for all of the love, support and many beautiful inspiring cards and letters of greeting. Your support is the backbone of my strength, you give not only me, but every prisoner who finds themselves being miss-used, abused and dehumanized a voice to scream, to shout at the world, this is un-acceptable and wherever in the world it is happening, it will not be tolerated.

We are better than we know or think we are. We must turn back to love, it is our only hope, our only salvation. Never be afraid to lend a helping hand or give a warm, gentle word of encouragement. We may not all the time find ourselves where we wish to be in this life, but troubles come to us all. And when it does, we must know and believe that we have the spirit and will to soar above all that is not godly.

We must believe in ourselves and each other. We must always take the path of love, so that truth, mercy and service can follow.

It is terrible thing to have one's freedom taken away from one, thrust into a small concrete hut and forgotten about, living on old memories because the present memories are too painful to re-live. Wanting to scream and not finding a voice. Yes, I have experienced just this, but overcome, and instead of old memories, I found new fortunes, instead of screaming my rage, I went inside and prayed for inner peace, and there, I found something that was waiting to be found. I found me, and I found God that dwells in me. There I found inner peace and peace gave me love.

When we harm one another, we harm ourselves and our surroundings. We must love our way from underneath hate's iron fist. Only then can we stop being mankind, and become human for humanities sake.

We must realize and recognize our blessings. A friend I went to school with was hurt in a car accident, paralyzed from neck down. I went to see him, and after we cried together, I told him "I'm sorry you cannot walk anymore". He looked at me and said " I don't have to walk, I just pray that one day I can crawl again". So the man with no feet is still blessed to be alive to crawl. When something is taken from us, something else is given to us. We must stop, and realize what it is. I may have lost my liberty, but my freedom can never be caged. I live and experience my life through the eyes of love and what a beautiful view it is.

Take away love and we have nothing, that is why your love is so important, it is the rope of hope that binds us together, so let us continue to commit to love for humanities' sake.

Thank you all for being the beautiful and caring people that you are. Without you, there can not be me. Hug a friend to day, and tell someone you love them.

I Love You.

Love is alive. Let Love Live.

Roger
May 2004

Quem é Roger Mc Gowen

Who is Roger W. McGowen?

Roger, an African-American, was born in Texas on Dec. 23, 1963 in Houston's tough Fifth Ward.

1. Roger's Youth

Roger was born on December 23, 1963 in 5th Ward, then one of the worst ghettos of Houston, Texas, the seventh of ten children. His parents divorced when he was still a child. Most of his youth was spent with his mother, a profoundly devoted Baptist, and a few years during adolescence with his father James. The 3rd Ward, where his father lived was less tough and unstructured, and Roger keeps a luminous memory of those years. Schools were slightly better, the streets tidier, people more open. His step-mother, Ernestine, encouraged him in his school work, and he formed a strong attachment to his half-brother Terry. His father was an electronic hydraulic engineer. He was killed in 1982, after someone tried to rob him, at 42, just as Roger was turning 18.

During his whole life, Roger kept in very close contact with his mother, who communicated her very lively faith to her son. In a brief, 10 page autobiographical document Roger described his mother in a manner that shows the profound impact she had on him:

”My mother was a lady who believed strongly in God and looked for the good in every one. She taught us the value of life, and also the heart ache of pain, which comes from suffering. She was the strongest person I ever knew in my life, and she remained that way till she was called home to God. And many of the lessons she taught me have remained with me till this very day. But at the time, when she was imparting her wisdom to me, I had no use for it. I was young and thought that I knew everything, only to learn that when I thought I understood, I found that I only misunderstood. So often we take the wisdom of our the elders for granted, not realising that we have not even begun to encounter half the things which they have experienced, the experiences that will eventually make or break us, as one says. My mother would tell me: “Roger, wisdom does not come from age, it comes from experience. It comes from countless encounters with the things that life will show us, give us or take away from us”.

It would be years before I would realise what she was talking about. And even today, I call upon her wisdom, from the grave where she now rests, to sustain me and guide me through the perils of a sometimes cold world.”

Life in the ghetto – or rather survival – was tough. When about ten years old, Roger started to work outside school with his uncle Jimmy. He had a large, 18-wheel truck. Later, he found a job in a restaurant. “When I was nine-ten years old, I was purchasing clothes for my sister Rhonda.” He started training for a job, but had to abandon the training to help his mother when his grandmother died.

Rogers’ elder brother Charles was, in Rogers’ own terms, his idol. It is important to understand their quasi symbiotic relationship to grasp what happened later, when Roger was accused of murder. “My eldest brother was well known around our neighbourhood. He was known for not being one to mess with, and being his little brother, I was privileged not to be messed with either, unless you wanted to deal with Charles.

"Man, could he fight. I saw him fight a guy one day for beating up one of his friends. It wasn’t really a fight. He hit the guy, and the guy hit the ground. But in other fights I watched him weave and bob and slip punches. I thought he could whip Mohammed Ali, the then heavyweight champion of the world.

"He and I were very close. I would try and follow him and his friends. He would see me and run me back home. But sometimes I would follow them from a distance, without them knowing. I tried to walk like him, talk like him, practically become him. He was my idol then. He was great. He used to talk to me and tell me things about him and his friends and swear me to secrecy. I thought I was carrying a real top secret and was ready to defend it with my life, if need be. Thank God it never came to that.”

Charles had brushes with the police very soon. At one time he was even charged with murder, but as he was still an adolescent, he was sent to a juvenile facility.

Shortly before passing on, their mother was taken to the hospital where she stayed quite a few days in a coma. In a letter dated March 6, 2005, Roger gave me the following details of this experience which would play such a crucial role in his life. Roger was visiting his mother, and “she came out of her coma. She was speaking very incoherently. She would start talking about one thing, then right in the middle [of the sentence] about something else. She realized it too, and started smiling. She said to me, ‘Roger, I don’t want to die, but I feel there’s nothing between me and God. I’m young, I have a lot to live for, but I’m at peace. If I don’t make it, look out for your brother. You are strong and always have been, and you’ve had it good. Your brother hasn’t. He can’t go back to prison. You are the backbone of the family. Take care of them.’ One of the nurses came into the room, and saw me talking to her, and realized she had come out of her coma. She rushed me from the room and that was the last conversation I had with her.”

At the time of the crime for which he was accused, Roger was 22 years old and worked full time. He was caring for his sisters, who lived the other side of town. He would stop by regularly to inquire about their well being, bring them food and make sure their bills were paid.

A member of his extended family who had the key to Rogers’car (he was the only one of his mother’s children to have one, and shared it generously) one day borrowed it. He was accompanied by Charles. They went to a bar to perpetrate a holdup. Witnesses took down the number plates of the car. Later the police arrested Roger at his apartment and accused him of the murder.

Because he wanted to protect his brother whom he then believed was responsible for the crime, Roger initially agreed to take the rap. As in his view of things, nothing tied him to the crime, he felt certain his innocence would become evident, especially as he had an alibi. Also, because of his mother’s death, he was going through a depression. He didn’t care what could happen to him. He felt the weight of the world on his shoulders. He hoped that through this sacrifice, he could show his brother how much he loved him, and that this would lead to Charles breaking with delinquency and changing his way of living. However, Charles was shot down by the police attempting a hold-up soon after Roger's arrest. This was probably one of the toughest experiences in his life: the man for whom he had taken the rap – and a penalty of death – being killed. His sacrifice seemed at that moment completely useless.

As is usually the case with poor African-Americans, he had a state appointed lawyer who never visited him once before the trial. The attorney prepared his plea on the basis of the police report. At different times during the trial, his own lawyer fell asleep.

2. The Trial

The trial was characterized by major judicial and constitutional errors.

As is alas not rare in the US, the district attorney contacted an inmate in prison, whom Roger had known as an adolescent, but whom Roger had not seen for ten years. Such people are called jail “snitches” and there is a unspoken agreement that if a snitch agrees to testify against an accused person he will receive a substantial reduction of his sentence. So this inmate invented about 1500 holdups he purportedly committed with Roger over a two and a half year period … despite the fact that Roger was working full time!

Roger wrote, “In one instance, [the snitch] said he and I robbed this old man who was a security guard at a supermarket. The prosecutor contacted the man and had him testify for the prosecution against me. [The snitch] said I had the knife and I was going to kill the man. But when the elderly gentleman took the stand he said it wasn’t me! He said it was [the snitch] and someone else.”

Also, Rogers’ lawyer never attempted to verify the convincing alibi he had. Two of Rogers’ sisters contacted the lawyer to inform him, but he never attempted to check this alibi, which could have saved Roger. His sister Rose Ayers ran after his lawyer and caught him on the steps of the court to tell him Roger was at her home. He did nothing with this piece of information and many others. These major mistakes constitute a serious violation on the lawyer’s part of the 6th amendment of the US Constitution, and of article I, section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Texas.
Neither did the lawyer attempt to contest serious breaches in the behavior of the jury. They alone would have justified a new trial. A few examples:

• In the room where they met, the jury had access to articles presenting a highly biased view of the crime, in which the police falsely claimed that Roger had committed about fifty armed hold-ups.

• One of the jury members, confirmed under oath that a former policeman and member of the jury had introduced in the deliberations of the jury information not presented in the court which influenced the decision of the jury in favor of the death penalty. Yet Texas law states clearly that “the presence of one partial juror on the jury destroys the impartiality of the body and renders it partial”. This ex-policeman was biased all through the trial and clearly made other jurors tip in favor of the death penalty.

• Various members of the jury were not in favor of the death penalty, but because of the strong personality of the former policeman who presented himself as an expert, they finally gave in. (This represents a violation of section 19 of the Constitution of the State of Texas, Due Course of Law).

• In violation of the US Constitution and the law, the judge refused to deliver instructions to the jury on the difference between voluntary homicide and voluntary homicide with premeditation

• Whereas the jury initially voted 11 to 1 for life imprisonment (hence against the death penalty), the judge presented information which erroneously implied that if Roger were condemned to prison for life, he would only spend a third of the time in jail and then be released. This untruthful information also caused the jury to switch its position in favor the death penalty.

Rogers’ first lawyer – whose defense was a mockery of justice - was reprimanded five times by the Texas Bar Association. He was finally forbidden from taking any death penalty cases by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals – alas too late in Rogers' case.

3. Developments since the Trial

Those are but a very few of the grave irregularities which marred the trial. Roger appealed the judgment, and was given a second lawyer who did not contact him for well over four years. Finally, Roger was able to reach him by phone. (In his first prison, Ellis One Unit in Huntsville, inmates could make two phone calls a year. This is no longer possible in the Alan Polunsky Unit where all Texas death row inmates are presently held). The lawyer informed him he had decided not to take the case, because one of the policemen on the case was a close friend of his! Roger asked him why he had needed over four years to come to this conclusion.

The second state appointed lawyer, when Roger entered the room where they met, asked him point blank, without even greeting him, “Why did you kill her?”(her = the owner of the bar who was shot). Roger politely told him he did not need a lawyer who had already made up his mind concerning his supposed guilt, and declined his services.

This is the system which enables inmates to spend up to 30 years on death row without being executed – surely one of the most unusual and cruel forms of punishment ever to exist in a civilized country. Roger has been in prison since the age of 23. He is now over 43 years old.

Thanks to a correspondent living in Switzerland, a group of friends in that country got together and gathered funds to hire a private lawyer, Gary Taylor, who used to practice law in Texas (and who defended Odell Barnes, whose case became world famous and in favor of whom even the pope intervened). In 1998, Gary Taylor presented a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the legal document demanding a new trial, in the Court of Criminal Appeals, State of Texas, and in the District Court of Harris County Texas (which by the way holds by a very large margin the US record for the death penalty.)

In the summer of 2005, Gary Taylor left Texas and another state appointed lawyer replaced him. This lawyer left Texas in the summer of 2006. That same year, an international support group with members in six countries was formed to help Roger. Roger asked the group to hire a new private lawyer, which was done in the fall of 2006. He is Anthony Haughton of Houston, Texas, who is now facing the very challenging task of putting together a new defense since the Court of Criminal Appeals rejected the earlier Writ of Habeas Corpus, claiming it had been filed too late.

During his first five years on Death Row, Roger did not receive a single visit. Little by little, this self-taught, modest hero of self-development and the spiritual path, started the long slow climb which enables him today to be an inspiration to hundreds of people across the world, and a teacher and model for many others.

“I believe in my heart that one day
I will walk out of here. I have never
thought otherwise”
(Roger, letter to S., 6.6.04)

Disclaimer: No information contained on this web site implicate Mr. McGowen's 5th or 6th Amendment Legal Rights. Mr. McGowen has no access to this site or control over its content in any way. The site and the information contained herein is supported by Friends of Roger McGowen, and the opinions, information, and content presented herein are solely ours. Any information presented has been obtained from the public domain.

PEna de morte

Background Information on the Death Penalty

"The punishment of death is pernicious to society, from the example of barbarity it affords. Is it not absurd that the laws which detest and punish homicide should, in order to prevent murder, publicly commit murder themselves?"
- Cesare Beccaria (18th century Italian thinker)

A brief history of the death penalty in the western world

"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice"
- Montesquieu (18th century French politician and philosopher)

The very first known codification of the death penalty can be found in the Sumerian Code of king Ur-Nammu (Mesopotamia, ca. 2100 BC) which stipulated that the crimes of murder, rape, robbery, and adultery must be punished by death. Three centuries later, the famous Code of King Hammurabi (Babylon) codified the death sentence for twenty-five different crimes. In the 7th century BC, the Draconian laws of Athens instituted the death penalty as the only sentence for all crimes, from the stealing of an apple from an orchard to murder with premeditation or treason. In those times, those found guilty of a (capital) crime were executed by crucifixion, drowning, burning at the stake, or impalement.

In the last two thousand years, the history of the death penalty in Western Europe has witnessed many ups and downs, with short periods of abolition, for example during the reign of William the Conqueror in 11th century England, and at the end of the 18th century in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany and in Austria, as well as periods with very high numbers of executions, most notably in 16th century England under the reign of Henry VIII, and later during the 18th century when 222 crimes, including cutting down a tree or stealing a rabbit, were punishable with death. Also, France saw a frenzied period of executions at the end of the 18th century during and just after the French Revolution (an estimated 40,000 were executed between 1789 and 1799), particularly during the "Reign of Terror," when the "Law of Suspects" was passed that made it possible to arrest and execute anyone whose conduct was deemed "suspect." In a nine-month period in 1793-1794, 16,000 were sent to the guillotine and at least as many died in prison. In some cities, the numbers of death sentences were so high that people were executed en masse with canon fire, because executions with the guillotine, one at a time, took too much time.

Throughout the Middle-Ages, offenses such as murder, sacrilege, theft, and (high) treason were liable to a death sentence, but during some periods heresy and a number of divergent opinions were considered capital offenses as well.

In the 19th century, most Western European countries applied the death penalty only to murder with premeditation and (high) treason, and at the end of that century Portugal and the Netherlands in Europe, and Venezuela, Costa Rica, Brazil, and Ecuador in Latin America were the first countries to abolish capital punishment (except for treason and collaboration in wartime).

After WWII, and after the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, the push for the abolishment of the death penalty grew strongly in Western Europe. In most countries, the last executions have been for treason, collaboration with the enemy, and war crimes in the years following the end of WWII, and several countries formally banned capital punishment soon
after. Although some nations like the UK, Ireland, Greece, Belgium, Spain, France, and Luxemburg still maintained the death penalty in their penal code for years or decades longer, executions became very rare occurrences. France was the last country in Western Europe to formally abolish the death penalty in 1977.

The Death Penalty in the United States of America

"An evil deed is not redeemed by an evil deed of retaliation. Justice is never advanced in the taking of a human life. Morality is never upheld by legalized murder."
- Coretta Scott King, widow of Martin Luther King, Jr.

The death penalty was introduced in the New World by the first European colonists. Sir Thomas Dale, founder of the Jamestown colony and first Governor of Virginia, instituted the Divine, Moral, and Martial Laws, under which a host of crimes, including such mild offenses as stealing grapes, killing a chicken, or trading with the Indians, were punished with public hanging.

By the second part of the 18th century, public hangings in notorious cases attracted crowds of up to 30,000 people. But under the influence of various European thinkers and philosophers, the end of the 18th century saw a profound religious and philosophical revival. Ideas about the dignity of human life, or the need for social reform and the necessity to end the vicious cycle of murder and revenge began to find ground in the United States. In particular, the ideas of Italian thinker Cesare Beccaria gave a strong impulse to the abolitionist movement, and eminent statesmen such as Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin embraced his views. There was a noticeable trend in society away from corporal punishment such as whipping, and the notion of extenuating circumstances such as age, insanity, and self-defence became more widely accepted. The state of Pennsylvania introduced the first formal reform of the law in 1790, taking sodomy, robbery, and burglary off the list of capital crimes, and four years later it formally codified the notion of degrees of murder severity, and only first degree murder (premeditated murder) remained punishable by death. This was both the result of a compromise with the Quaker community, which was opposed to the death penalty, and of the growing awareness of the times.

The Bill of Rights (the first ten Amendments to the United States Constitution) was introduced by James Madison in 1789 and became effective in 1791. The eighth amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment ("no excessive bail shall be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted"). Those six words would come to play an important role at different moments in the history of capital punishment in the United States (see below, and also "recent developments").

A few decades later, in 1834, Pennsylvania was the first state to ban all public executions, soon followed by all New England and Mid-Atlantic states (Kentucky was the last state to ban public executions, in 1936, when the last public hanging took place). Michigan was the first state to abolish the death penalty in 1846 for all crimes except treason, quickly followed by Rhode Island, Wisconsin, Iowa, Maine, and Colorado. The last three, however, reinstated it later on. The abolitionist ideas grew in popularity until the onset of the Civil War (1861-1865). After the Civil War, the public debate began to focus more on the civil rights issues, and the whole question of capital punishment moved to the background, and after a brief period of liberalisation at the beginning of the 20th century, a conjunction of social, intellectual, political, and economic factors led to a frenzy of death sentences and executions between 1920 and 1940, with an average of 167 executions per year in the 1930s.

This tendency reversed itself after WWII, and Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, West Virginia, Vermont, and New York joined Michigan, Minnesota, North-Dakota, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin in abolishing capital punishment. A Gallup Poll in 1966 showed that nationwide support for the death penalty had dropped to 42%. In 1972 the United States Supreme Court declared capital punishment unconstitutional ("cruel and unusual punishment"), thereby removing the sword of Damocles from above the heads of the 629 death row inmates at the time. But only four years later, that same Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty. All the states that had the death penalty before 1972, introduced it again, and the situation remained unchanged until December, 2007, when New Jersey abolished it.

As of August, 2008, 14 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia do not have the death penalty; 36 states, the Federal Government, and the U.S. Military do. However, it must be noted that New Hampshire, Kansas, and the U.S. Military have not carried out any executions since before 1972, and in January, 2003, the state of Illinois issued an executive clemency for all of its 167 death row inmates. Also, the New York Sate Supreme Court ruled in 2004 that the execution procedure in force in the state (lethal injection) was in violation of the state's constitution, and since no efforts have been made to find an alternative procedure, the state of New York has not applied capital punishment since that year. The same situation occurred in Nebraska: the Supreme Court of Nebraska ruled in 2008 that execution by the electric chair violates the state's constitution, and in the absence of an alternative procedure, Nebraska has no capital punishment anymore.

During the Clinton Administration, two Acts of Congress were passed and ratified by the president: the "Violent Crime Control Act" of 1994, which made 60 new federal crimes liable to the death penalty (including three that do not involve murder or the loss of human life), and the "Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act" (AEDPA) of 1996, which restricts access to new state hearings for claims of actual innocence for those sentenced to death, and imposes shorter filing deadlines for all habeas corpus claims. Possibly as a result of the AEDPA, the numbers of executions began to rise again until the year 2000. Since then, the trend reversed itself, but the numbers are still higher than before 1994. Only 2008 will probably end with fewer executions, due the de facto moratorium that lasted from September 25, 2007 through April 16, 2008 (see below "recent developments").

As of August, 2008, about 3,265 men and women are on death row in the United States, of which 360 are in Texas.

The situation in the world today

"There will be no lasting peace either in the hearts of individuals nor in any society until death is outlawed"
- Marcel Camus (20th century French author and philosopher)

Not a year passes by without at least one country abolishing capital punishment. Since the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989, Eastern European countries have one by one renounced the death penalty. The Council of Europe demands that new members sign Protocol 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights at the earliest possible date. Protocol 6 prohibits the death penalty except in times of war. Although not all forty-seven member states have ratified Protocol 6 yet, no death sentence has been given or execution been carried out in those countries since they joined the European Council. For example, the death penalty is still codified in Russia, but no execution has taken place since 1996, and the government has issued an executive clemency for all its death row inmates (716) in June, 1999. The Ukraine, formerly one the world leaders in numbers of executions, signed Protocol 6 in 1999.

In the rest of the world, the countries with the most confirmed executions in 2007 were China (470), Iran (317), Saudi Arabia (143), and Pakistan (135). The real numbers are probably (much) higher, especially in China and in Iran, where the state tightly controls all new media, and where it is practically impossible for outside observers to have access to reliable information. Of all the fully developed countries, only Singapore, Japan, and the United States are still administrating the death penalty in 2008.

By 1984, 64 countries had abolished the death penalty, and by 1996, 100 countries had done so. As of February, 2008, well over half of all countries in the world have written capital punishment off their penal code.

The origins of lethal injection

"What is murder in the first degree? It is cruel, calculated, cold-blooded killing of a fellow human. It is the most wicked of crimes, and the State is guilty of it every time it executes a human being"
- William Randolph Hearst

The idea to replace death by hanging or the firing squad with a chemically induced form of execution was first suggested in 1888 by New York MD Julius Mount Bleyer in an article in the Medico-Legal Journal. He proposed to inject the condemned with six grains of morphine, in what he saw as a more humane, cheaper way to put someone to death, thereby also robbing the person of the potential hero status conferred by hanging. His idea did not find any following. Nearly half a century later, Nazi Germany developed the "T-4 Euthanasia program," one of seven methods to eliminate those deemed "unworthy of life."

In 1977, the Oklahoma State medical examiner, Jay Chapman, developed what has become known as "Chapman's Protocol," a three-step injection method that was approved by Dr. Stanley Deutsch, MD, then head of the Department of Anaesthesiology of the Oklahoma University Medical School. Although making use other chemicals than those used by the Nazis, the method is fundamentally the same, that is, the intravenous injection of chemicals that will induce death within minutes.

Following Chapman's protocol, once the prisoner has been placed on a gurney and is properly restrained, two intravenous (IV) tubes are inserted in his arms and wired through a wall opening leading to the "anteroom," where the executioner takes his place. A saline solution is flushed through the IVs. Then a three-step procedure follows:

1) An anaesthetic, usually sodium thiopental (widely known as "Pentothal"), a powerful barbiturate, will induce a deep sleep and general anaesthesia. With the proper dose, the critical concentration of the chemical in the brain will be reached within 30 seconds. Then, the saline solution flushes again through the IVs.

2) A paralysing agent, such pancurium bromide ("Pavulon"), tubucarine chloride, or succinylcholine is injected. These are all muscle relaxants that will induce the paralysis of the diaphragm and the lungs. It works within 1-3 minutes after injection. Then, once more, the saline solution is flushed through the IVs.

3) A toxic agent (not in all US states), such as potassium chloride, is injected in a lethal dose to induce cardiac arrest. A minute or two later, the prisoner will be declared dead.

Oklahoma was the first state, in 1977, to pass a law that replaced the electric chair with lethal injection to execute death row inmates. Texas followed suit later that same year and carried the first execution by lethal injection in 1988. Of the 1,119 executions carried out since 1976, 948 people have been executed by lethal injection, and 171 by other methods, mostly electrocution (as of August 15, 2008).

Recent developments

"It is a weak nation that finds it appropriate to execute its own citizens to uphold moral"
- Lars Von Trier, Danish film maker

The painless and humane aspects of the execution by lethal injection have been increasingly put into question by eminent MDs, especially since 2003, as extensively reported in the United States news media. Specialists (anaesthesiologists, neurologists, and biochemists) contend that death by this method is often excruciatingly painful and agonizingly long, due to several factors, such as the wrong dosage of the chemicals, incorrect protocol, and inadequate monitoring during the procedure.

Although the method seems foolproof and painless at first sight, and on paper, it has often led to many problems and has resulted in a cruel form of torture lasting for up to well over thirty minutes in some cases before a prisoner could be declared dead. Medical specialists have pointed out that several major flaws in the lethal injection method make it a "cruel and unusual punishment."

For example, the first chemical, the thiopental, is a so-called ultra-short acting barbiturate whose concentration in the brain will wear off by being redistributed to the entire body within 30-60 seconds after it has been injected. As soon as it begins wearing off, consciousness returns and the prisoner will suffer an excruciatingly painful death when the second chemical, the muscle relaxant, is flushed through the IVs, causing the paralysis of every muscle in the body, making it impossible for the inmate to communicate that he is conscious and in pain. The prisoner dies slowly suffocating. Even if the first chemical is still present in sufficient amounts in the brain when the muscle relaxant is injected, the danger exists that the muscle relaxant will actually dilute the thiopental, resulting in the same situation, i.e. the person regains consciousness and the anaesthetic effect disappears.

According to several specialists, the dosages actually used during executions are often unacceptably low, lower even than would be admissible during surgery.

Another factor that makes death by lethal injection a potentially horrifyingly painful way to die is the inexperience of the personnel administering the drugs. Not only are they not medically trained to administer such drugs, but they do not realize that each person needs specific doses of the drugs, according to various parameters such as body weight, general condition, condition of heart, lungs, etc, and that such a procedure should be monitored closely. The executioner is located in another room and cannot monitor the situation of the person being put to death, and is unable to assess whether the person has regained consciousness and experiencing severe distress.

The ethical problems surrounding medicated executions have been pointed out repeatedly in recent years. Whereas the American Medical Association says that a physician's position on the death penalty is a matter of personal view, he/she should not participate in an execution, except for certifying death - but only after someone else has declared the person dead. Most states do not require that a MD administer the drugs, but some do, which is in direct violation of the Hippocrates Oath ("first do no harm"). On the other hand, if no specialist, such as an anaesthesiologist, is present to control that the proper dosage of the chemicals is administered, and to monitor the whole procedure to ensure that the death row inmate is not regaining consciousness or in distress, there is no way to prevent "cruel and unusual punishment."

As more and more arguments are being brought forth supporting the contention that death by lethal injection is much less simple and pain free as originally believed, several executions, in various states, have been stayed, and, most recently, the United States Supreme Court agreed on September 25, 2007, to hear a lethal injection challenge arising from two Kentucky death row inmates, Baze and Bowling, in a case known as Baze v. Rees. Baze and Bowling argued that lethal injection constitutes "cruel and unusual punishment" and is therefore in violation of the United States Constitution's 8th Amendment (see above, "The death penalty in the United States"). Rees, Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections, had refused their petition in State Court, upon which Baze and Bowling appealed to the Supreme Court.

A few hours after the Supreme Court made the announcement of the upcoming hearing, Texas executed the last prisoner before a de facto (= existing in fact, whether by right or not, as opposed to de jure, existing by law or decree) moratorium on all executions became effective in all states with the death penalty, pending the Supreme Court's ruling on the matter. After the hearing in January, 2008, the Supreme Court ruled in favour of Rees by a vote of seven to two, on April 16, 2008, thereby upholding Kentucky's method of lethal injection. Several states resumed executing death row inmates a few weeks later. From May through August, 2008, twenty-one inmates have been executed by lethal injection, eight of them in Texas (where twelve more are scheduled to be executed before the end of the year).

Nebraska (electric chair) is the only state that does not use lethal injection as sole or alternative method of capital punishment. Twenty states use lethal injection as well as alternative methods (lethal gas, electrocution, firing squad, hanging), contingent on the prisoner's choice, or the dates of sentence or execution, or the unconstitutionality of the method at the moment of the execution. The other states have recourse to lethal injection only.

In recent years, other countries in the world have adopted lethal injection as their preferred method of execution, most notably China (1997), Guatemala, the Philippines (1999), Thailand (2003), and Taiwan (2005).

The case of Ernest Ray Willis

Ernest Ray Willis became the eighth person exonerated from Texas death row, on October 6, 2004, and the 120th person nationwide since 1973. Willis had been sentenced to death seventeen years before for allegedly setting a house on fire, thereby killing two people. United States district judge Royal Ferguson held later that the state had administrated medically inappropriate anti-psychotic drugs to Willis without his consent; that the sate had suppressed evidence favourable to Willis; and that Willis had received ineffective representation during both the guilt and the sentencing phases of his trial. He mandated the state to either free Willis or to try him again.

The District Attorney hired a new fire investigation expert to examine the evidence, and the expert's conclusion was that "there is not a single item of physical evidence in this case which supports a finding of arson" (San Antonio Express-News, October 5, 2004).

The State Attorney General's office decided then not to call for a new trial, and the prosecutors dropped all charges against Ernest Ray Willis. In his conclusion, District Attorney Ori White stated that Willis, "simply did not do the crime. I'm sorry this man was on death row for so long and that there were so many lost years." (Los Angeles Times, October 7, 2004).

Since Ernest Ray Willis' exoneration, nine more men have been freed from death row. The latest, as of August, 2008, are Glen Chapman (April 2, 2008) and Levon "Bo" James (May 2, 2008), both from North Carolina, after respectively 14 and 15 years behind bars.

Since 1973, 129 men and women have been freed from death row, whether because their conviction was overturned and they were acquitted at a re-trial or all charges against them were dropped, or because they were issued an absolute pardon by their governor on the basis of new evidence of innocence. They have spent an average of 9.5 years on death row.

But other innocent men and women did not have that luck and have been executed. And some are still on death row, and have been for years; some, like Roger McGowen in Texas, for over two decades.

"I shall ask for the abolition of the punishment of death until I have the infallibility of human judgement demonstrated to me"
- Thomas Jefferson

"As a victim, as a colleague, I stand before you to ask that you vote to abolish the death penalty, not so much because I want murderers to live, but because if the state kills them, that forever forecloses the possibility that those who are victims might be able to figure out how to forgive. We've lost enough already. Don't take that option for healing away, please"
- Robert Renny Cushing, whose father was murdered in 1988, speaking as member of the House of Representatives in New Hampshire in 1988.

Disclaimer: No information published on this web site implicates Mr. Roger McGowen's legal rights, as defined in the United States Constitution's 5th and 6th Amendments. Mr. McGowen has no access to this site, nor can he exercise any control over its content. This web site and all the information contained herein are supported by friends of Roger McGowen, and all the opinions, information, and content presented herein are solely theirs. All information presented on this web site has been obtained from the public domain.

Um dia numa prisão By Roger Mc Gowen

The Allan Polunsky Unit in Livingston, Texas

The Allan Polunsky Unit where Roger is imprisoned houses about 3500 inmates, 370-450 of which are on death row (depending on the year and number of executions). It is a huge, poorly built "bunker" that is deteriorating so rapidly that some of the cells get flooded during heavy rainfalls. The living conditions in this very peculiar place are as utterly desolate and horrifying as one could expect from a place called "death row."

However, it is important to emphasize that in the years since we started corresponding with Roger, in 1997, those conditions have worsened steadily, to an extent that is little short of inconceivable, and unquestionably constitutes "cruel and unusual punishment." For example, the food served to the inmates is of an appallingly poor quality, and is barely enough to keep them alive. Roger mentions in a letter (summer of 2004) that their daily intake is probably around 1600 calories, which the World Health Organization (WHO) describes as the minimum intake for the survival of a male adult. Since then, things have only gotten worse.

In the spring of 2003, all Texas death row inmates were moved to the Allan Polunsky Unit in Livingston, near Houston, and since then the severity of the prison regime has increased dramatically.

The inmates cannot watch television anymore. They are allowed to have a radio in their cell, but the reception is so poor in most cells that a radio is of little use. Only three (music) stations are available, alternatively Mexican or Rock/Country, and Rap. They used to be allowed to make use of a simple word processor, if they could afford one, but now they can only use primitive typewriters that Roger recently described as "just a step above a chisel and a rock." The typewriter ribbons they need are sold for an absurdly high price, and are of such poor quality that no more than about ten pages can be typed with one ribbon. The amount of stamps they are allowed to purchase diminishes each year.

They used to be able to play a game of volleyball, basketball, or chess during their daily recreation hour outside their cell, but since 2003 they spend that hour alone, just as they spend every hour of every day. They have been deprived of almost all their personal belongings. The prison rules make it an offence for an inmate to put a picture of his child(ren) on the wall of his cell. They used to be able to engage in creative art work, an activity that not only provided some solace and a (renewed) sense of self-worth, but was for many inmates a way to express their feelings of appreciation and love to family and friends. All that had been prohibited, with the exception of a few colour pencils and some paper and cardboard for those who can afford them. They are not allowed to do any work that could generate some income, which is depriving many of them of the only means they have to purchase even the most basic items of toiletry, such as toothpaste, a toothbrush, shaving cream and razor blades, a comb, shampoo, or soap for laundry (the clean clothes and sheets they get every week are often so filthy that they must be washed again, with cold water, in the tiny cell sinks).

Whenever the inmates are allowed to leave their 10 x 6.5 ft. cells, for example to go to the showers or to exercise on their own in the "day room" (see below), they are cuffed, sometimes shackled as well, and escorted by two guards. If they have a visitor, they are escorted in the same way, and led to a metallic cubicle of 3 x 3 x 6 ft. with a Plexiglas window for a non-contact visit. The only physical contact on Texas death row is that of the guards' hands restraining the arms of the inmate. After the visit, the inmate is strip searched before being escorted back to his cell.

The heating/air-conditioning system that regulates the temperature in the entire unit is more often than not out of order, or the thermostat is set so low in the winter months that the inmates suffer badly from the cold (they wear only light cotton pants and shirts-- the most fortunate ones own a sweatshirt-- and they have only one light blanket for the sometimes intensely cold nights). During the summer the temperature often gets so high in the cells, 113 degrees (45 degrees C) or even higher one some days, that the inmates nearly suffocate. The same happens with the water in the showers, often icy cold in the winter, and scorching hot during the summer.

The daily routine on death row is highly disruptive and a source of constant stress for the inmates. It is never possible to sleep for more than two or three hours at a time. Unpleasant surprises and changes in the daily schedule are sprung on the inmates at all times, depriving them of one of the only things that could help them maintain some degree of balance and sanity: a sense of safety, and of relative control over what is left of their lives and their identity.

One can say, without overstating it, that everything in that prison is designed to make the lives of the death row inmates as miserable as possible. Every means to dehumanize and humiliate them seems to be put into practice. There is an ombudsman the inmates can send complaints to, but as soon as the guards know that a complaint has been received, they will take their revenge by any means, legal or illegal, on the inmate himself, or on a whole group, by enforcing a "lock down," for example. A lock down is a disciplinary, twenty-four hours/day confinement period, imposed on a whole wing of death row (60-63 inmates), lasting usually from two to four weeks, during which the severity of the prison rules is intensified, and during which the only food served to the inmates would typically be two pieces of white bread with a little bit of peanut butter, three times a day.

Death row truly does justice to its name. It is a place where men, and a few women, are waiting, each in turn, in a row, for their institutional death, in the most inhuman circumstances imaginable in a modern democratic society.

A "typical" day for Roger

As Roger explains in his book, there is seldom what one could call a "typical" day, especially in an environment where inmates are purposely deprived of a regular schedule. However, many days can approximately enfold according to the following routine:

Roger frequently suffers from insomnia that can last for up to two-three nights. But normally he will get up at around 6 am, which means he will have missed breakfast, usually served at…3 am! Outgoing mail will often be collected at 5 am, so if he wants to send a letter, he will have to get up then. At 6 am, the first change of guards takes place. Before that, between 5 and 6 am, the guards from the previous shift will have turned on all the lights and made the first roll call of the day; every inmate in turn must call his name and number, just to make sure nobody is missing. Half an hour later, the new shift guards repeat the whole procedure. Then Roger can start his day, usually with some physical exercise, a condition for survival for someone living 23 hours a day (and sometimes non-stop for days on end during a lock down) in a 10 x 6.5 foot cell.

Lunch is usually served at around 9 am. After lunch, Roger often spends a long moment, if it is at all possible, in quiet prayer and meditation. He wrote once, in February, 2004: "I have to meditate and pray just about hourly, because it is almost impossible to set any kind of schedule in here. Every minute is a new reality that must be dealt with and prayed upon. So one learns to sort of pray on one's feet, so to speak. But I always pray for the same thing mostly: more love to be shared between mankind. I ask God to grant wisdom and insight to us all, that we may have clearer vision to see beyond the illusion." (Roger is referring here to the illusion or veil of material beliefs which prevent us from being aware of the ultimate reality, which many believe is purely spiritual in nature). "I pray so much through the day that I do it unconsciously. I study the Bible regularly. I try to keep from reading too much structured and organized religious material, because I feel in my heart I know what is expected of me by my Creator."

On most days, if inmates are not under a lock down, Roger will have one hour to recreate, either in the prison yard—the only time the inmates ever leave the prison building, but even then they are confined in a roofless, enclosed space of roughly the same dimensions as their cell—or in what is called the "day room," an open room in the corridor next to the cells, where they have a little more space to move around. At some point during the day, he will normally have the possibility of taking a shower, in a tiny space close to the cells. Showers are frequently cancelled during lock downs.

Inmates spend hours talking, or rather shouting, to each other through the small grid of their cell doors. Some inmates prefer to use the times between meals to take a nap if they can, read a book, pace back and forth in their cell, or write to family or pen pals. Roger spends a lot of time answering letters from friends around the world. But he also enjoys reading, which is actually the only way to "escape" death row for a while. The level of noise is almost constantly very high, day and night, with people shouting, cell doors being slammed, inmates screaming at the tops of their lungs because they lost their sanity, or because they simply do not see any other way to express their frustration, fear, anxiety, anger, sadness, pain. At other times, there is a deathly silence that is almost as unnerving.

The second change of guards takes place at 2 pm, with two roll calls. Dinner is served between 3:30 and 4 pm. Any incoming mail will be distributed between 7 and 8 pm. And the third change of guards will take place between 9 and 10 pm, with again, two roll calls. Between midnight and 2 am, "clean" underwear, socks, pants, and shirts will be distributed a couple of times during the week, and once a week "clean" bed sheets and pillowcases. And at 3 am…breakfast is served… Welcome to a bright new day in the Allan Polunsky Unit.

Disclaimer: No information published on this web site implicates Mr. Roger McGowen's legal rights, as defined in the United States Constitution's 5th and 6th Amendments. Mr. McGowen has no access to this site, nor can he exercise any control over its content. This web site and all the information contained herein are supported by friends of Roger McGowen, and all the opinions, information, and content presented herein are solely theirs. All information presented on this web site has been obtained from the public domain.